Tesla Lemon Law: Steering and Suspension Issues Are Getting Harder To Ignore

Tesla wheel comes off causing accident

Tesla Steering and Suspension Issues Key Takeaways

Tesla Lemon law has done it again, this time it’s not a ground-breaking EV case, it’s Tesla being in denial. What about? Their suspension and breaking axles are not tens of thousands of cases of  “vehicle abuse” but a chronic defect that they have ignored for years. 

Reuters researched thousands of Tesla cases around the world within the past 7 years and their findings point to an obvious engineering flaw or failure. 

What ‘s the next step? Will Tesla owners lean on the Lemon Law to get their faulty Tesla repair expenses refunded since Tesla refuses to cover the costs?

Tesla Lemon Law Steering and Suspension Issues

Tesla Suspension and Axel issues outline

Tesla Suspension Problems

Tesla vehicles, including popular models like the Model Y, Model 3, and Model X, have encountered a series of steering and suspension failures. These failures have manifested in various forms, including:

  • Sudden loss of steering control.
  • Power steering outages.
  • Premature wear and failure of suspension components, such as control arms and steering knuckles.

Suspension issues reported to Tesla

Numerous Tesla owners have reported incidents where these failures led to dangerous situations. Notable examples include:

  • A 2023 Tesla Model Y experiencing a suspension collapse with less than 24 hours of ownership.
  • A 2020 Model 3 owner facing a detached front wheel while driving on Autopilot.

Tesla’s engineering team acknowledges the issue

Tesla’s engineering team has acknowledged these issues, leading to multiple redesigns of affected parts. However, despite these efforts, problems persist, raising concerns about the efficacy of these redesigns.

Tesla S axle issue

Tesla's Response to Steering and Suspension Issues

Handling Customer Complaints

Tesla’s approach to handling these complaints has been a subject of debate. Instances of denying responsibility and attributing failures to “prior” damage or “driver abuse” have been reported.

Regulatory Interaction and Recalls

In terms of regulatory compliance, Tesla’s communication with safety regulators has been inconsistent. While some recalls have been initiated, especially in markets like China, a similar level of responsiveness has not been observed in the U.S. and Europe.

Financial Implications for Customers

Customers have often borne the cost of repairs, especially in out-of-warranty situations. This has led to financial burdens and a loss of confidence in Tesla vehicles.

Tesla Model S Suspension issue

Analyzing Tesla's Quality Control and Safety Measures

Quality Assurance Processes

Questions arise about the effectiveness of Tesla’s quality control systems. The frequency of these failures suggests potential gaps in testing and validation processes for critical vehicle components.

Safety Implications

The steering and suspension issues pose significant safety risks, particularly at high speeds or in challenging driving conditions. Tesla’s commitment to safety is thus under scrutiny.

Comparing Tesla's Issues with Industry Standards

Industry Benchmarking

When compared to industry standards, Tesla’s issues with steering and suspension components are notable.

Most automakers face occasional recalls, but the persistent nature of Tesla’s problems is uncommon.

Best Practices in Automotive Engineering

Best practices in automotive engineering emphasize robust design, rigorous testing, and proactive customer communication regarding safety issues.

Tesla’s approach in these areas appears to need refinement.

Lemon Law criteria

Tesla's Steering and Suspension Challenges and The Lemon Law

Tesla is at a pivotal point in tackling its steering and suspension problems. With the safety and reliability of its vehicles at stake, Tesla must take decisive steps to address these issues.

How can Tesla’s approach improve?

  1. Improving Quality Control: Enhancing quality control processes is essential to prevent future steering and suspension failures.

  2. Engaging with Customers and Regulators: Transparent engagement with both customers and safety regulators is crucial. This transparency is particularly important as an increasing number of consumers, frustrated with Tesla’s reluctance to accept responsibility for these issues, are considering leveraging lemon laws. These laws protect consumers against vehicles with repeated, unresolvable defects.

  3. Developing Lasting Solutions: Implementing effective and long-term solutions to these technical challenges will help restore customer trust.

Ensuring the safety and satisfaction of its customers is vital for Tesla to continue as a leader in the electric vehicle market. Addressing these challenges head-on will help maintain customer confidence and the company’s reputation for innovation and quality.

Tesla Steering Issues FAQs

Tesla vehicles, notably the Model Y, Model 3, and Model X, have experienced problems such as sudden loss of steering control, power steering outages, and premature wear of suspension components like control arms and steering knuckles.

Tesla has often been criticized for denying responsibility for these failures, attributing them to “prior” damage or “driver abuse” rather than acknowledging defects in the parts themselves.

Yes, Tesla is facing inquiries from safety regulators, including Norway’s safety regulator, over frequent failures of suspension and steering parts that the company has long known were defective.

Owners often bear the cost of repairs, especially in out-of-warranty situations. This has led to financial burdens and a loss of confidence in Tesla vehicles, as seen in cases like a Tesla owner facing a $14,000 repair bill a day after purchase.

About The Author

Scroll to Top

We are unable to complete your call at this time

Seraphinite AcceleratorOptimized by Seraphinite Accelerator
Turns on site high speed to be attractive for people and search engines.