Consumer Lemon Law logo


Vehicle Brands That Have The Most Lemon Law Claims in California

How Lemon Law claims in California affect manufacturers
The usual components that are defective from the manufacturer.

Key Takeaways:

  • More than 7 million New Vehicles Registered in California from 2018 to 2021, only 34,397 Lemon Law cases were filed in CA courts
  • In 2021, only 1% of the 6 million vehicles recalled by the Federal Government resulted in cases
  • GM consumers that purchased a new car in California are 26 times as likely to file a Lemon lawsuit. 

For decades, the California Lemon Law has protected consumers from defective vehicles. Manufacturers are stood as a testament to consumer protection, ensuring that vehicle buyers are not left stranded with defective cars. This law, which has become a model for other states, offers a robust defense against manufacturers that fail to uphold their warranty obligations.

Our article takes a look at a study done in 2021 by The Public Intrest Network, a non-profit auto safety and consumer advocacy group.  In the study, it reviews the history of the California Lemon Law, and which brands continue to rack up claims against them. 

Are you curious about which brands face the most claims and which ones have the fewest? We’ll reveal that too. By the end of this article, you’ll have a clear idea of how this law works, why it’s so important for anyone considering buying a car in California, and which car brands you might want to keep an eye on.

Which Car Manufacturers Have The Most California Lemon Law Claims?

Research into California’s electronic court filings provided insight into which car manufacturers have the most California Lemon Law Claims. Notably, there are significant variations among manufacturers. 

Toyota, for instance, faces the least number of lawsuits relative to its market share, while General Motors faces the most.

The California Lemon Law doesn’t just serve as a protective measure for consumers; it also has profound implications for manufacturers. Here’s how it affects them:

⭐Accountability: The law ensures that manufacturers are held directly responsible for the quality of their vehicles. This accountability pushes them to maintain high standards and avoid potential legal repercussions.

⭐Reputation Management: Brands that frequently face lemon law claims can suffer reputational damage. In an age where information travels fast, consistent claims can deter potential buyers, impacting sales and brand loyalty.

⭐Financial Implications: Beyond refunds or replacements, manufacturers might find themselves burdened with legal fees, especially if consumers win their cases. This can result in significant financial losses.

⭐Incentive for Quality Control: The law indirectly promotes rigorous quality control checks. Manufacturers are more likely to invest in thorough testing and quality assurance to prevent defects and avoid lemon law claims.

⭐Transparency Requirement: Manufacturers are mandated to provide clear and comprehensive information about repurchased “lemons,” ensuring future buyers are informed. This transparency can influence a brand’s image and trustworthiness in the market.

Below is a visual breakdown provided by of how many cars are sold per Lemon Law case. 

Lemon Law Cases in CA 2021

The Spectrum of Defects

Consumers who have initiated litigation under the CA Lemon Law have reported a wide array of vehicle defects, ranging from brake failures and transmission issues to electrical malfunctions. These defects not only pose a risk to the vehicle owner but also to other road users.

Here’s a closer look at the variety of issues consumers have reported:

Mechanical Issues

From the engine cutting off suddenly, to the transmission not shifting properly, consumers have reported these defective components through their claims.

Electrical Issues

Problems can range from malfunctioning infotainment systems to more serious concerns like faulty wiring that might lead to fires.

Safety Concerns

Some defects directly compromise the safety of the vehicle's occupants, such as malfunctioning airbags, seat belt failures, or ineffective anti-lock braking systems.

Fuel System Problems

Issues like fuel leaks or problems with the fuel injection system can not only affect performance but also pose safety risks.

Structural Defects

These relate to the physical structure of the vehicle, like a compromised chassis or issues with the vehicle's suspension system.

Environmental Defects

Some defects, like those causing excessive emissions, can have environmental implications, violating emission standards and contributing to pollution.

California Lemon Law Cases

Over the years, numerous cases have emerged that highlight the importance of the California Lemon Law. These cases underscore the challenges consumers face and the vital role the law plays in ensuring justice.

A Glimpse into a Real-life Case

Alvin Ruis vs GM CA lemon law

The true impact of the California Lemon Law comes to light when we delve into real-life cases that everyday consumers have faced. These stories underscore the challenges and the vital role the law plays in ensuring justice:

🚩Alvin Ruis vs GM

Alvin purchased a 2017 GMC Sierra 1500 from his local dealership. Despite the vehicle being under warranty (5 years/60K miles), he experienced significant transmission and brake system issues.

 The problem escalated once the GM dealership was not able to repair the problem after multiple attempts and the manufacturer refused to give a refund or replace the vehicle. Alvin hired a Lemon Law attorney in February 2021 and proceeded to file a lawsuit on his behalf. 

In April 2021, the traction control features plus the brake and transmission problems allegedly caused Alvin to lose control of the vehicle and landed him in the hospital with two broken vertebrae in his back and an injured shoulder. 

As of the writing of this article, the case is still pending in court. 

This case, among countless others, highlights the diverse challenges consumers face when dealing with defective vehicles. They emphasize the importance of the California Lemon Law in providing a platform for redressal and holding manufacturers accountable for their products.

Brands Under the Spotlight: Who Has The Most Lemon Law Claims in CA?

The landscape of California Lemon Law cases offers a revealing insight into the automotive industry. While some brands have managed to uphold their reputation for quality, others have found themselves more frequently on the receiving end of consumer complaints.

General Motors: A Frequent Offender

General Motors, an iconic American automaker, has unfortunately emerged as one of the brands with the highest number of lemon law claims relative to its market share. Consumers have reported a myriad of issues, from transmission glitches to electrical malfunctions.

The sheer volume of claims suggests that while GM has a storied history of automotive excellence, there are areas where it needs to bolster its quality control measures.

Toyota: Setting the Benchmark

On the other end of the spectrum, Toyota stands out as a brand with the least number of lawsuits in relation to its market share. This Japanese automaker’s commitment to quality and reliability seems to be paying off in the context of California’s Lemon Law. Toyota’s consistent performance in this arena serves as a testament to its dedication to consumer satisfaction and vehicle safety.

The California Lemon Law serves as a mirror, reflecting the quality standards upheld by various automakers. While some brands, like General Motors, need to introspect and address recurring issues, others like Toyota can take pride in their consistent track record. As consumers, it’s crucial to stay informed and make choices that prioritize safety and reliability.

As vehicles continue to evolve, so too must the laws that govern their safety and reliability. For now, Californians can take solace in the fact that they have one of the strongest legal protections in the country when it comes to defective vehicles.

California Lemon Law and Its History

The California Lemon Law, officially known as the Tanner Consumer Protection Act, was enacted in 1982. It was designed to offer protection and legal recourse to consumers who found themselves with seriously defective vehicles.

The law mandates that auto manufacturers provide refunds or replacement vehicles if they fail to rectify major issues that arise during the warranty period.

The Origin of the Law in CA

The California Lemon Law, more formally known as the Tanner Consumer Protection Act, traces its roots back to the early 1980s. It was a time when consumers were increasingly frustrated with being stuck with defective vehicles and having little to no recourse.

The law was named after its primary advocate, Assemblyman Sally Tanner, who recognized the need for stronger consumer protections. 

CA Lemon Law Sally Tanner

Rosemary Shahan, a consumer activist, played a pivotal role in pushing for its enactment. After experiencing firsthand the challenges of dealing with a defective vehicle, Shahan rallied support and became a vocal proponent for the rights of consumers. Her efforts, combined with those of other advocates, led to the law’s passage in 1982.

The Tanner Act amended the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, setting a precedent for other states to follow. It was a groundbreaking move that shifted the balance of power, ensuring manufacturers were held accountable for the quality and reliability of their vehicles.

How Does It Protect Consumers?

The California Lemon Law offers a multi-faceted shield to consumers, ensuring they aren’t left at a disadvantage when faced with a defective vehicle.

Here’s a breakdown of the protections it offers:

✔️ Refund or Replacement: If a vehicle is deemed a “lemon” after multiple unsuccessful repair attempts or if it’s out of service for an extended period, manufacturers are obligated to either refund the purchase or provide a replacement vehicle.

✔️Reimbursement: Consumers can be reimbursed for incidental costs related to the defect, such as towing or rental car expenses.

✔️Legal Fees: If a consumer wins a lemon law case, the manufacturer is often required to cover the consumer’s attorney fees, making it easier for individuals to seek legal representation.

✔️Protection from Repurchased Vehicles: Manufacturers must title and register repurchased “lemons” appropriately, ensuring future buyers are aware of the vehicle’s history.

✔️Extended Warranty Period: If a defect is reported during the warranty period but isn’t rectified by its end, the warranty is extended until the issue is resolved.

By offering these protections, the California Lemon Law ensures consumers have a robust safety net, holding manufacturers accountable and promoting transparency in vehicle transactions. 

Ready to start filing your claim? Call us and we will connect you with a Lemon Law attorney in your area. 

CA Lemon Law and Manufacturers

While the California Lemon Law serves as a model, it’s essential to understand its specific provisions and how they apply within the state. The CA Lemon Law has been instrumental in ensuring that roads in California remain safe by holding manufacturers accountable for their vehicles’ quality and safety.

How long can a dealership hold your car for repair in California?

In California, a dealership cannot keep your car for more than 30 days for repeated repairs. The CA lemon law states that an authorized dealership has 2 to 3 opportunities to fix your defective vehicle or 30 days. 

Vehicle Manufacturers With The Most Claims in California FAQ's

California Lemon Law is designed to protect consumers who purchase or lease defective vehicles, entitling them to a replacement or refund if the vehicle cannot be repaired under warranty.

California Lemon Law covers anyone who purchases or leases a new vehicle with an existing warranty, including cars, trucks, motorcycles, and motorhomes.

You can file a Lemon Law claim in California if your vehicle experiences recurring issues that substantially impair its use, safety, or value, within the warranty period.

To file a Lemon Law claim in California, you typically need to follow a four-step process, which may involve notifying the manufacturer and providing evidence of repair attempts.

About The Author

Scroll to Top

We are unable to complete your call at this time